|
The Great 1857 |
"Fort Tejon" Earthquake |
Shake, Rattle,
and Roll |
by Aron
J. Meltzner
Undergraduate Student, California Institute of Technology
and Research Fellow, U. S. Geological Survey
Originally published in the January, 1998 Fort Tejon Post Return |
| |
 |
When earthquake scientists, or seismologists, think
about great earthquakes in California in historic
times, three in particular stand out. The most recent "great" earthquake
to strike California was also the most famous: the
1906 " San Francisco" earthquake, which
(along with the fires that followed) destroyed much
of San Francisco and was felt over most of California.
Only thirty-four years earlier, in 1872, Owens Valley
in eastern California was rocked by an earthquake
that was felt over good portions of both California
and Nevada. And the largest earthquake to hit Southern
California in historic times occurred on January
9th, 1857, and it came to be known as the great " Fort
Tejon" earthquake, although such appellation
could be very misleading.
|
Fort Tejon, in fact, was not the epicenter, nor was
it even near the epicenter of the earthquake. Surface
rupture originated northwest of Parkfield in Monterey
County and propagated southeastward for over 360 km
(225 miles) along the San Andreas Fault to the Cajon
Pass northwest of San Bernardino. Technically, Parkfield
was the epicenter of this earthquake, as it was the
origin of the rupture, but most scientists would be
more concerned with the extent and location of the
entire rupture; Fort Tejon was approximately the midway
point of the rupture. The earthquake actually acquired
its name because Fort Tejon was the only populated
locality near the fault, and naturally, the Fort suffered
more damage than the rest of sparsely-populated 1857
Southern California.
In comparison to the other "great" earthquakes
of historic times, the 1857 "Fort Tejon" earthquake
was significantly larger than the 1872 Owens Valley
(estimated magnitude 7.8) quake, and was equally as
large as, if not larger than, the 1906 "San Francisco" earthquake
(estimated magnitude 7.9-8.0). Estimates for " Fort
Tejon" are also in the vicinity of magnitude 8.0.
The 1857 and 1906 events were both on the San Andreas
Fault, although the 1906 earthquake ruptured the northern
segment of the fault, from Hollister (San Benito Co.)
northward, for 400 km (250 miles). Duration of shaking,
along the fault, for both 1857 and 1906 is estimated
to be as long as two minutes.
In areas away from the fault, such as Los Angeles,
San Bernardino, and Santa Barbara, damage from 1857
was surprisingly light, although it is unclear how
modern high-rises would respond to the long-period
motion experienced at significant distances from
large earthquakes; high-rises may be more susceptible
to long-period ground motion than low buildings.
Fort Tejon, on the other hand, suffered considerable
damage from the mainshock, and it was battered by
aftershocks for months and years to come -- both
a direct consequence of the Fort's proximity to the
fault. Two large aftershocks (approximate magnitudes
6.0-6.5) occurred within a week following the mainshock,
which were felt over much of Southern California,
although aftershocks were still being felt on a weekly
basis at Fort Tejon over a year later. And it is
expected that if any other locations along or near
the fault (i.e., Wrightwood, Palmdale, Frazier Park,
or Taft) were populated back then, those locations
would have reported similar intensities during the
mainshock to those at Fort Tejon, and those locations
could have experienced just as many aftershocks.
The 1857 quake was the last so-called "Big One" in
Southern California, and a similar event will almost
certainly happen again in the future. Questions remain,
however, as to when it will occur, and whether the
next "Big One" will be as big as 1857. Los
Angeles appears to have fared well last time, but it
remains unclear how modern structures will respond
in the future. It turns out that for Los Angeles, San
Bernardino, and Santa Barbara, blind thrust faults
and other local faults are a bigger risk than the San
Andreas Fault, simply because the former are closer
to the population centers and because we know less
about them, but for Fort Tejon, Palmdale, and other
cities along the San Andreas, the San Andreas remains
the biggest threat. Only by continued monitoring and
research can we hope to understand and reduce the seismic
hazard over all of Southern California. We can never
prevent earthquakes, but by knowing what may happen,
we can prepare for them.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Here is also an excerpt of an article that appeared in the
Los Angeles Star of May 30th, 1857, nearly five months after
the mainshock. Your readers may find it interesting:
"EARTHQUAKES. — It appears that old mother earth
is still troubled with the consequences of her great convulsion
of the 9th of January last. She has not yet recovered her quiet
and steady habits, but exhibits the weakness of her internals
by shakes, of almost nightly occurrence. Fort Tejon, seems
to be the region where her disease is located, for the good
people of that Post, are almost nightly entertained with earthquake
shocks. Last week, one or two very severe shocks occurred there,
which awoke the sleepers and sent them in a hurry to breathe
the fresh air of the parade ground...."
|
| |
|
| |
|